The right to freedom of expression, freedom to develop one's talents and personal freedom – freedom in every sense of the word – and equality were important to people in the national dialogue. Political participation was also a key issue. People want to get involved, play an active part in shaping their environment and have a say in decision-making.
The right to freedom of expression, freedom to develop one's talents and personal freedom – freedom in every sense of the word – and equality were important to people in the national dialogue. Political participation was also a key issue. People want to get involved, play an active part in shaping their environment and have a say in decision-making.
“I’d like to be able to choose how I lead my own life without fear.”from an online response submitted on 22 June 2015
Free, secret, equal and direct elections are at the heart of our democracy. Voter turnout shows the percentage of the eligible electorate that actually voted. It is a good indicator for people's interest in politics and often reflects particularly controversial political and social issues that are important at the time.
Yet not everyone uses his or her right to vote. After peaking in the 1970s, voter turnout has dropped significantly in Bundestag elections. It reached its low point in the Bundestag elections of 2009. In the last Bundestag elections 2017 voter turnout increased significantly. More than 76 per cent of eligible voters exercised their right to vote, which was five percentage points higher than in the last elections.
It is striking how differently population groups use their right to vote. People who are unemployed, on low incomes and of low socio-economic status vote less often than higher income and higher status groups.
The last Bundestag election was held on 24 September 2017. About 61.69 million German citizens were eligible to vote. Around 46.98 million availed themselves of this right to vote, corresponding to a voter turnout of 76.2 per cent.
Select your municipality or city:
The dots show voter turnout at the Bundestag election in 2017 for just over 400 districts and cities that do not belong to a district in Germany – from left to right, from the lowest to the highest voter turnout. On the map, every interactive dot stands for a district or city.
The transparent dots provide a comparison with the voter turnout at the Bundestag election in 2013. How does voter turnout in 2013 compare with turnout at the Bundestag election in 2017 in the 400 districts and cities in Germany?
The green lines connect voter turnout in 2013 and 2017 for the 400 districts. If the lines go up, this means that voter turnout in 2017 fell compared to the Bundestag election in 2013. If the lines go down, this means that voter turnout in 2017 rose compared to the Bundestag election in 2013.
It shows that in all districts and cities more people cast their ballot. This is a continuation of the trend already seen in recent Landtag elections.
With 73.2 per cent, voter turnout in eastern Germany was generally lower than in western Germany. However, compared to the previous Bundestag election, voter turnout increased by 5.7 percentage points. This increase was larger than in western Germany.
In western Germany voter turnout was at 76.8 per cent. Compared to the Bundestag election in 2013, voter turnout increased by 4.4 percentage points.
Marked regional differences in western Germany: Overall voter turnout as well as regional differences were higher in western Germany. With 84.1 per cent of eligible voter casting the ballot, the district of Starnberg in Bavaria had the highest voter turnout in Germany. In turn, Bremerhaven had the lowest voter turnout with only 63.1 per cent.
In eastern Germany voter turnout was highest in the city of Dresden with 78.4 per cent and lowest in the Salzlandkreis with 63.3 per cent.
Increase in voter turnout all over Germany: In each of the 401 districts voter turnout increased in the 2017 Bundestag election. The increase in voter turnout was smallest in Bremerhaven with a plus of 0.1 percentage points and highest in the district Freyung-Grafenau in Bavaria with 12.1 percentage points.
Largest increases in voter turnout in Bavaria: When comparing voter turnout in the 2013 and 2017 Bundestag elections, the 40 districts with the steepest increases in voter turnout were all in Bavaria. Increases were particularly marked, because Bavarian voter turnout had reached an all-time low in the 2013 Bundestag election.
Districts with highest voter turnout in western Germany: More than 80 per cent of eligible voter cast their ballot in the 40 districts with the highest voter turnout in the 2017 Bundestag elections. More than half of these districts were in Bavaria and five each in Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate.
Low voter turnout prevalent in eastern Germany: Less than 70 per cent of eligible voters cast their ballot in the 40 districts with the lowest voter turnout in the 2017 Bundestag election. Of these, 24 districts were in eastern Germany, mainly in Saxony-Anhalt, but also in some regions of Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-West-Pomerania. Of the districts with low voter turnout only few are in western Germany, mainly in Bavaria and North Rhine-Westphalia.
“Democracy is a gift, but there is lack of awareness of just how great this gift is.”from the national dialogue event of the Deutsche Naturschutzring in Berlin on 1 September 2015
When it comes to voter turnout, many state elections experienced a development comparable to that at the federal level. Following a decline in voter turnout in the middle of the decade, there have recently been significant increases in all state elections.
A comparison of voter turnout at the last and last-but-one Landtag elections shows that two federal states saw a fall in voter turnout, namely in Hamburg and Hessen.
In all other federal states, the year 2016 mark a trend reversal. Many voters were motivated to have their say at these elections because of the hotly debated issue of refugee policy. This trend continued in the years to come: In all federal states, the voter turnout increased. In Brandenburg, Bremen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Saxony it even increased by more than ten percentage points. However, voter turnout at the second last Landtag election was below 50 per cent, so only one in two of the eligible electorate actually voted.
The Federal Agency for Civic Education (Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung) provides information and helps voters to make decisions in the run-up to elections, for example with its online tool Wahl-O-Mat. The federally funded political foundations also work to promote active political participation.
“I wish citizens had more opportunities to participate. This event is a good start.”
This statement by a participant at the national dialogue event of the Naturpark-Verein in Bad-Düben on 6 June 2015 shows that many people who took part in the initiative believed opportunities for political participation are important in order to create closer involvement. They spoke more specifically about strengthening direct democracy, for example through referenda at federal level.
It is important for democracy that citizens are well informed about policy and have opportunities to help shape it. This applies equally at federal, state and local level.
The aim of measuring opportunities for political participation is served by an indicator taken from the European Social Survey.1 It measures how people perceive their ability to influence politics.
In 2014, 47 out of 100 citizens believed they had no or only very little chance of gaining an effective hearing for their beliefs and interests. Only 15 out of 100 people believed they were able to exert a strong influence on politics.
Here too, groups with higher socio-economic status tend to take a more positive view of their opportunities for co-determination. Men and women with higher educational qualifications are three times more likely to be optimistic about their chances of co-determination that people with a lower educational level. West Germans are more positive about their chances than East Germans.
Compared to other countries in Europe Germany comes in the top third, in sixth place. People in Norway and Switzerland believe they have better opportunities for co-determination. The figure is much lower in Lithuania, Romania and Italy.
The results show the following: firstly, it is necessary to better communicate the existing opportunities for political participation and their effectiveness. This includes regular citizens' consultations, petitions, civic initiatives and referenda, along with party membership and the active and passive right to vote. It is a case of finding the means and opportunities for participation and encouraging poorly represented groups to get involved.
It is also important to try out new forms of participation, encounter and dialogue between citizens and politicians. Participants in the national dialogue were aware that they also have to take action. Only people who are actively involved can help to shape decision-making.
The federal government has opened up new opportunities for people to make their voices heard, for example the federal government's "Dialogue on the Future of Europe". Citizens' debates are also taking place throughout Germany to mark the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall and German unification. Other federal ministries have also joined in these debates.
Our society is based on fundamental rights of freedom and equality. They guarantee that everyone in Germany is free to grow and develop as long as they do not impinge upon the rights of others. Participants in the national dialogue discussed fundamental rights in all their facets. The freedom to express one's opinion, staying informed thanks to an independent press, freedom of faith and religion – all of these aspects were important to everyone.
“Being able to state your opinion without facing prosecution is a valuable asset.”from an online response submitted on 16 June 2015
It is very difficult to measure the situation with regard to how freedom and equality is actually guaranteed and how Germany compares to other countries. The World Justice Project index is one of the few international indices that allows this comparison. It is based on a survey and expert interviews.
Eight selected fundamental rights are measured individually and together on a scale of 0 to 1 (optimum conditions): equal treatment and absence of discrimination, the right to life and security of the person, compliance with due process of law and rights, freedom of opinion and expression, freedom of belief and religion, freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy, freedom of assembly and association, and fundamental labour rights.
Compared to other countries Germany enjoys a high level of freedom, particularly with regard to freedom of opinion and assembly. In 2019 it came sixth out of 126 countries in the survey. However, the ranking showed that it has room for improvement in the areas of equal treatment and absence of discrimination as well as the right to privacy.
The independent justice system headed up by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) watches over the maintenance and protection of fundamental rights and the free press. The German General Equal Treatment Act (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz) and the German Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes) work to remove existing inequalities.
The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency has been promoting more equal treatment since 2006. With its Live Democracy! (Demokratie Leben!) programme the federal government is seeking to combat ideologies that oppose freedom and democracy. It has earmarked more than 115 million euros of annual funding for this programme in 2020.
Along with Germany, 22 other EU countries took part in the eighth edition of the European Social Survey, which includes questions on opportunities for participation. Compared to the previous edition of the survey, the rating scale has changed from eleven to five levels (from 1 "not at all" to 5 "a great deal").